09/07/2025 / By Laura Harris
Rep. Beth Van Duyne (R-TX) has reintroduced legislation that will cut off federal funding to so-called “sanctuary cities,” jurisdictions that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities.
The bill, titled the No Congressional Funds for Sanctuary Cities Act (HR 205), seeks to block such cities from receiving federal funds and would claw back any unspent federal dollars allocated over the past five years. The legislation targets local jurisdictions with policies or ordinances that hinder enforcement by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or shield undocumented immigrants from deportation.
Under the bill, sanctuary cities would be banned from receiving congressionally-appropriated community project funds, including Community Development Block Grants (CDBG). It also directs federal agencies to identify unspent funds given to sanctuary jurisdictions over the past five years and recover those allocations.
“Basically, my bill says if you’re a sanctuary city, you’re not going to get federal dollars, and we’re going to claw back unspent federal dollars of the last five years of your sanctuary city,” Van Duyne, who represents Texas’ 24th congressional district, said on the “Just the News, No Noise” TV show. (Related: Representative Tenney calls for defunding sanctuary cities and sanctuary CAMPUSES at U.S. universities.)
This is not the first time Van Duyne has introduced the bill; it was first brought forward during the 118th Congress. She is now renewing her push as immigration and border security remain hot-button issues ahead of the 2026 midterms.
“Radical sanctuary city policies undermine our national security and endanger citizens across our country,” Van Duyne said in January. “I’m introducing this bill to support President Trump’s plan to deport criminal illegal aliens by leveraging the power of the purse to pressure local governments to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement.”
Sanctuary cities in the U.S., as defined by Brighteon.AI‘s Enoch, are jurisdictions that adopt policies to limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement agencies, often by refusing to detain individuals solely based on their immigration status or by not allowing local law enforcement to inquire about a person’s immigration status. These cities aim to create a more welcoming environment for undocumented immigrants by providing a degree of protection from deportation and fostering trust between immigrant communities and local authorities.
But Van Duyne, a staunch supporter of President Donald Trump, echoed the tough-on-crime and anti-sanctuary city rhetoric of his administration.
In line with this, she accused sanctuary cities of prioritizing political posturing over public safety. She also pointed to rising crime rates in several major cities and criticized their leaders for rejecting help from federal authorities, as Trump repeatedly clashed with local officials over the deployment of federal agents.
“I’m shocked that these city mayors don’t want that help,” she said. “It’s amazing how all they want is cash. You know, they come in and out of our offices all the time – asking for money and for appropriations and more CDBG [Community Development Block Grant] funds. Here you have a president who is allowing them to save face, and you still have them in denial.”
Visit Migrants.news for more stories like this.
Watch JD Rucker discussing how Trump is seeking an executive order to end sanctuary cities in this clip.
This video is from the JD Rucker channel on Brighteon.com.
Trump slams Newsom over sanctuary cities, wildfire mismanagement.
Trump administration prepares crackdown on illegal immigrants in sanctuary cities.
Trump moves to cut federal funding for “death trap” sanctuary cities.
Democrat sanctuary cities are BUSING ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS OUT of their areas.
Sources include:
Tagged Under:
America first, Beth Van Duyne, big government, cancel Democrats, city crisis, Collapse, funding, illegal immigration, legislation, national security, sanctuary cities, Texas
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2018 BANNED.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. Banned.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Banned.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.